|
||
12 de Setembro 4.° feira/wednesday Seminario: sessio de trabalho n.° 4 working session n.4 |
||
Sessio de trabalho n.° 4 / Working Session n. 4"Edificoes culturais e educativos novos e diferentes para uma aprendizagem ao longa da vida e envolvimento da Comunidade: Repensar a natureza dos edificoes e dos recursos educativos e culturais" / ”New and different cultural and educational spaces for life long learning, the community context: Rethinking the nature of buildings and educational facilities“ |
||
Local/Place: |
Auditorio da FA UP/FA UP AuditoriumRodolfo Almeida |
|
Moderad(t)or : |
Rita Vega da Cunha |
|
Relator : |
Francisco Sena Santos, RDP/ broadcasting “RDP” journalist |
|
Convidado/Guest: |
Bruce Jilk, arch., USA |
|
9:00- 10:45 |
Intervencoes/Interventions: |
|
|
Rita Vega da Cunha, Apresentacao do Tema/Presenting the Theme Portugal Bruce Jilk, arch. A framework for life long learning and the Community Context Minnesota, Wisconsin, USA Jadille Baza, Rodolfo New educational spaces for the Chilean Educational Reform Almeida – Chile/UNESCO Lourdes Melendez e Cost efficiency in the construction of public school facilities. Results Eduardo Millan, Venezuela Janusz Wlodarczyk, Polonia The synergy of Existing School Space with Various public spaces for Permanent Learning Anton Schweighofer, Return to the Future – Back to Public Spaces Vienna |
|
10:45 |
Intervalo para cafe/ Coffee break |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sessao 4 / Session 4 ResumosAbstracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
A Framework for Life Long Learning and the Community Context |
Presenter: |
BRUCE A. JILK. AIA |
|
The planning and design of learning environments for life long learning can best be approached by thinking about a world where our best ideas of today are implemented. This is in the spirit of realising that we create our future, it is not something which waits to be discovered. The real challenge lies in understanding how our "best ideas" come together as a whole and in a manner which will serve our communities. Rather then contemplating the impact such things as changes in technology, classroom design, new building materials or alternative project delivery systems we will have, the approach taken here is to start with the "big picture." Once this framework is in place, these particular issues will fall into alignment. For understanding what form our learning environments will take to best serve society, we will start with identifying the major issues communities face. At an OECD Program for Educational Building held in Crete in 1996, common to all participating countries were the following four issues: 1) Financial constraints were requiring institutions to reconsider their fundamental role; 2) Technology was changing the methods of delivery; 3) Legal issues were increasing; and 4) All members of society required continuous education. What is common to all four of these issues is that they go beyond the confines of the traditional educational institution. These are community issues and require a community response. Community SchoolsThe relation between schools and communities is not new. For many years we have attempted to bridge these components of society by designing community schools. City planners developed these concepts about 100 years ago. In the 1960's and early 1970's the concept was used to justify huge facilities. More recently the pressure has been for these schools to deliver a wide range of community services. These include such things as social, health and dental, employment, and family services. This connection between the community and the educational institution is an attempt to address some very social needs. However, the traditional concept of school is being stretched ,in its effort to accommodate these functions. Community of LearnersAnother approach to embracing this change has been to move from thinking of community schools as central to their neighbourhoods (citadels) to creating a community of learners. This is a community that is a good place to live, work, and play and where everyone is engaged in lifelong learning. The attributes of such a community of learners include learning for everyone, anytime, anyplace, and the learning is appropriate. The attention is on both the audience and the learning process. Because learning is distributed (through technology) the more familiar examples include virtual learning organisations such as the Western Governors University. Some existing communities are moving in this direction. These include Ithica, NY and Portland, OR for example. This concept is also consistent with the ideas of "New Urbanism" but to date the educational practice in these communities has been very traditional. Learning CommunityAn often stated (but little understood) goal in school design today is to create a "learning community." This is a community that is continually expanding its capacity to create its future; the community its self is a learner; and it's a community that responds to needs much faster than others. The attributes include: Developing personal mastery; Questioning mental models; Building shared vision; Encouraging team learning; and Thinking in systems. In other words, this is a community where the members know they are in this together, they really care, they do what they say, and they know they will be better off as a result. These are in addition to the attributes listed above for a community of learners. The key distinction is that a learning community is its self a learner. Designing learning communities is a significant challenge because there are no models to follow. There are some key points to guide us. First, there needs to be powerful purpose stories (a shared, compelling vision). Learning communities are about relationships and connections between and among people and systems. Stories are metaphors that describe these relationships. What is being shared is the "similarity of difference" or the connections that underlie the stories. Second, there are clear, tangible, visible, shared learning outcomes for the community. These are the attributes listed in the paragraph above. Third, everyone is a learner. Learning is lifelong and continuous. The physical environment for a learning community has some very clear characteristics. These include: 1) the understanding that learning will happen in many places, not just a place called school; 2) we need to dissolve borders among learning settings; 3) these various settings need a coherent network; 4) the settings need to adapt quickly; 5) the design shall provide a sense of identity; 6) the setting will enhance social connectivity in the community; 7) the environment responds to differences in learners; 8) informal learning shall be enhanced; and 9) provision shall be made for both general and specialized study. Although there are no models to guide us in the design of a true learning community, there are some projects we can learn from. These include Louvain-la Nuvoue and new learning cities in Australia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
"The Educational Reform in Chile and its impact on the design and use of educational buildings" |
Presenter: |
Presentation by Jadille Baza and Rodolfo Almeida, Technical Co-ordinators of the Joint Project Ministry of Education/UNESCO's Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean. |
Session 3. Educational and cultural facilities as live organisations and their architectural capacity to be renovated and reused by all generations. |
|
|
As we have already informed you in the last Seminar in Jerusalem, we are working together on the above-mentioned project. This time we will focus our presentation on the impact that the educational reform togetherwith our joint project are having not only on the design of educational buildings, but on their architectural programming which involves the participation of the community and the use of the educational buildings by the community itself and the use of the community facilities by the students, i.e. Learning in Public Places, topic of this Seminar. Up to previous years, educational establishments designed in Chile were based on a typified building system, similar all over the country: the problem was to satisfy the increasing demand. Since the 1990's, with the educational reform and its decentralization process, architecture tries to respond to innovations in curricula, to the specific educational projects of the community, as well as to adapt and respond to local social, economical and cultural situations, with the aim of the educational establishment becoming part of the public space, and to consider education and culture in a permanent process that involves all the community students, parents, architects, etc. Communities are now participating in the definition and priorization of their needs, be it educational, social and cultural; educators and architects are working together for an architecture (or architectures) which facilitate the educational process, diminishing inequities between regions and localities, urban and rural, with the objective to provide all children and young people with access to an education of quality and to make this education available to the community where the educational establishment will be inserted. The changes that are happening now in the relationship education-architecture-culture in Chile are multiple. complex and unprecedented. These changes can be exemplified by: the meaning that an educational establishment has for its community, and how the community influences the architecture; educational buildings painted in the same colour searching for a corporative image; the construction of new buildings which have stimulated the community to modify their houses or the physical environment where the educational building is located; educational buildings that function also as the local radio; the use of the school patio by the community to play and gather for social and cultural manifestations; the use of schools' workshops. library, sports field by the community; the use of existing workshops or shops in the community as learning places for the students; the integration of public space with school space; the influence of urban architectural elements or morphology on the design of educational establishments; etc. It is worth concluding that the decade of the 1990's and the onset of the twenty-first century marks a new beginning: architecture for education in Chile is well launched on a challenging new path. We will illustrate some of these changes with slides from various parts of Chile and with some of the work we are doing with the Joint Project MINEDUC/UNESCO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Abstract: |
COST EFFICIENCY IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES |
||||||||||||
Presenter: |
Arch. A. Eduardo Milan,Arch. Lourdes Melendez |
||||||||||||
|
Venezuela, as a developing country, has great restrictions for supplying the public school system with first quality conditions — at the physical, spatial and functional level - and for meeting all the technological requirements of today's education. These restrictions come mainly from the government's budgeting and allocation of funds that are a few years behind the real needs. As a consequence, there is an urgent need to develop construction cost's indicators in order to have accurate budgeting foundations for the strategic plans that involve the construction and furnishing of school buildings. Last year, the "Venezuelan Foundation for the Construction and Fumishment of Schools" (FEDE), engaged the professional services of Arch. A. Eduardo Millan and Arch. Lourdes Melendez, whom, together with a multidisciplinarian staff, carried out a research process to compare construction costs among different state agencies responsible for the construction of schools facilities, and to develop cost indicators to be used for budgeting and public funds allocation purposes. The research process involved the assessment of actual school buildings to obtain data on the following variables: original investment cost of the school building, structural system, durability of constructive elements, and degree of accomplishment of the school building's functional, spatial and programmatic official quality standards. The results obtained are summarised as follows:
GENERAL CONCLUSION
Caracas, July 2001 Research done for "The Venezuelan Foundation for the Construction and Furnishment of Schools" (FEDE) by Arch. A. Eduardo Milian, Arch. Lourdes Melendez Arch. Hector A. Cedres and B.Sc. Rina Romero |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
Synergy of Education and the Existing School Space with Various Public Spaces for Permanent Learning |
Presenter: |
Janusz A. Wlodarczyk |
|
The AbstractShape of the school space in the Modern Movement and earlier . Efforts to learn outside the school building — the significant educators in the early modernism (Freinet, Devey a.o.). Influence of the post-modern ideas on the education ; the example of the transformation of the post-modern theatre - the spectacular and the adequate - for different features of the school. Future education spaces — attempt of anticipation: the meaning and the possibility of integrating of the existing school building with the environment, the meaning and the possibility of using the city spaces for education. |
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
Return to the Future — Back to Public Space |
Presenter: |
Prof. Anton Schweighofer |
|
In the shadow of a tree in a market place, a young man listened to another man. That was the place to learn. The content of learning was connected with his life and interest. Imprinted by openness and self-determination, he took the information he wanted to have.
But the content of learning changed. It became ordered by power, without openness, without self-determination. A house came instead of a place.
A closed space, in the form of a monastery, or a military camp, and later a house called "school" with classrooms. The transformation of this "educational order" is still defined in architecture as the "school building." Architects are trained to design buildings. That is their trade, and we need buildings. But the respected qualifications of this type of building today have different values. "Beauty" in Europe, "the highest standard" in the USA, "economical" in poor countries, "safety" where terrorism and vandalism occur, "type" where quantity is the problem.... And the school- building, equipment and facilities are in the end determined only by politics, administrators and educators. Therefore we should ask if it is always the building that solves the problem of education. Now is again a change in many of the things that we are used to doing. The educators know this, and ask for new equipment, but they work in the same old closed spaces. The new possibilities are seen as pragmatic, and the conservative tools are still the lectures and the classical school-curriculum. And we don't see the chance to do this in a new space! The question for the architect is, is there a better architectural answer to the new situation? Is it still good to teach in an isolated house? Not reacting to the new possibilities and necessities? Network-, global-, multicultural-, individual-, self-determined-, creative-thinking is as important as classical knowledge! The life-conditions such as water, air, nature, the climate, and natural resources can be only understood by most people if they are directly confronted with the problems—Not only in the virtual, abstract, and in theory! Also the physicists found solutions in the vision of our universe when they looked back to Euclid and Aristotle! Why should we not respect the experience of the past! Life is one of the most important educators. Where life can be studied is not only in a public place, but also from a "public space." It is time that architects include this fact as an architectural element in their educational and cultural work. Learning becomes dealing with the free, abstract, and changing environment in which we live. One collects learning experiences similarly to how a car fills up at gasoline stations. This results in adaptable spaces--objects that are adaptable to their changing, free, abstract, and virtual environment--objects that are implanted in the outside environment and react to and interact with it.
The city for children in Vienna, a project from the 70's called the "Stadt des Kindes," has now to be re-used. I believe that this could be of interest, and therefore I try to explain this project as an example for discussion.
Prof. Anton Schweighofer 31.07.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sessao 4 Session 4Biografias Biographies |
|
|
|
|
BRUCE A. JILK, AIA
Ability and experience in organizing process have made Mr. Jilk a leader in educational consulting. This combination enables him to provide quality services within a unique format. He has worked for educational clients since the mid 1960s focusing on projects with innovative programs. Currently his work includes development of Learning Communities and related issues such as lifelong learning, connections between conventional educational services and enterprise, linking further education with the world of work, use of new information and communication technologies, and the integration of services such as health and education through new technologies. He has consulted and design learning environments in over twenty states and in Austria. Australia, Azerbaijan, Canada. Finland, Germany, Italy. The Netherlands. and Saudi Arabia. Experiences include those of educator, author, research, planner and architect. EducationUniversity of Minnesota, Bachelor of Architecture University of Wisconsin, Post Graduate Studies Minnesota, Wisconsin NCARB Certificate RegistrationAmerican Institute of Architects – AIA/Minnesota Professional AffiliationsCouncil of Educational Facility Planners. International AIA Architecture for Education Committee AIA liaison to: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development American Association of Community Colleges Research and Publications"Learning Environment Applications," United States Department of Education/NCRVE Benchmark Assessment of Primary and Secondary Schools, New South Wales, Australia "Learning Environments," New Designs for the Comprehensive High School "School Facilities Planning and Design Guidelines," (co-author) Minnesota State Department of Education "The Design Impact of the House Concept in Middle School Education," Conference on Architecture and Education. Racine, Wisconsin "Integration of Academic and Vocational Curriculum," National Conference on Integration. Beaver Creek, Colorado "New Designs for the Comprehensive High School," International Conference on 2 1 st Century Education. Raleigh. North Carolina "Learning Environments." New Design for the Two-Year Institutions Over 200 presentations including: OECD, AASA. SREB. CEFPI. ASBO, NSBA. AIA, COST, LETA Relevant ProjectsHigh Schools School of Environmental Studies. Apple Valley. Minnesota Oregon School District. Oregon. Wisconsin Bellingham High School #3. Bellingham, Washington Rochester High School. Rochester. Minnesota Charlottesville High School, Charlottesville. Virginia Newport News High Schools (2), Newport News. Virginia Chaska High School. Chaska. Minnesota Kennewick High School #3, Kennewick, Washington Meadowdale High School. Edmunds, Washington Eagan High School. Eagan. Minnesota Glenbard High School #5, Glen Ell n. Illinois Apple Valley Senior High School. Apple Valley. Minnesota Craig High School, Janesville. Wisconsin Owatonna High School, Owatonna. Minnesota Career Education District. St. Louis. Missouri Geneva Unit School District. Geneva, Illinois Kenosha High School #3. Kenosha, Wisconsin Middle and Junior High SchoolsMiddle School, Oregon, Wisconsin Fargo Castle Rock Middle School. Castle Rock, Colorado Oregon Middle School, Fargo, North Dakota Sioux Falls Middle School, Sioux Falls, South Dakota Geneva Middle School, Geneva, Illinois Dakota Hills Middle School, Eagan. Minnesota Bemidji Middle School, Bemidji, Minnesota Rochester Southeast Junior High School, Rochester, Minnesota Willow Creek Intermediate School, Owatonna. Minnesota Elementary SchoolsDelano Elementary School, Delano. Minnesota Woodland Elementary School, Eagan, Minnesota Willow Creek Elementary School, Owatonna, Minnesota Deerwood Elementary School. Eagan, Minnesota Bluff Creek Elementary School, Chanhassen, Minnesota Geneva Elementary School. Geneva, Illinois Isanti Elementary School. Isanti, Minnesota Cambridge Elementary School, Cambridge, Minnesota McKinley Elementary School, Owatonna, Minnesota Lincoln Elementary School. Owatonna, Minnesota Washington Elementary School. Owatonna. Minnesota Oak Park Elementary, Owatonna. Minnesota Post Secondary SchoolsU.S. Department of Education funded research project "New Designs for the Two-Year Institution" Trafton Science Center Expansion, Mankato State University, Minnesota St. Mary's University, Winona, Minnesota Mankato State University. Manka.a, Minnesota Rochester Community College. Rochester. Minnesota Murphy Hall, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis University van Amsterdam. Netherlands University van Holland. Netherlands Hamline University Master Plan, St. Paul, Minnesota Torrens Valley Institute. Adelaide. Australia University of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland Hennepin Technical College, Anoka. Minnesota San Diego Community College. San Diego, California Brainerd Community College and Technical College. Brainerd, Minnesota Miscellaneous SchoolsThe International School of Azerbaijan. Baku, Azerbaijan 8 Kingdom Schools, Saudi Arabia Westonka Public Schools, Mound. Minnesota WMEP K-12 Downtown School. Minneapolis. Minnesota Milton Hershey School. Hershey, Pennsylvania Winona Public Schools. Winona. Minnesota Saint Paul Open School. Saint Paul. Minnesota Greeley Public Schools. Greeley. Colorado Learning CommunitiesMulti-Function Polls, Adelaide, Australia 100.000 Person City Expansion. Ultrecht. The Netherlands Eastern Waterfront. Helsinki. Finland
|
|
|
|
RITA VEIGA DA CUNHA |
|
Licenciatura em Ci8ncias Biologicas pela Universidade de Lisboa Licenciatura em Ciencias Pedagiagicas pela Universidade de Coimbra "Diplome d'Etudes Approfondies" em Ciencias da Educacao, OKA() Politica de Educacao pela Universidade de Paris VIII Certificado de Estudos Europeus pela Universidade Livre de Bruxelas Funcoes exercidas e experiencia professional
A partir de Novembro de 2000 a julho de 2001 Conselheira Tecnica da Secretaria de Estado da Administracao Educativa responsavel por varias areas, entre as quais a dos equipamentos educativos.
A partir de Abril de 1996, Conselheira Tecnica Principal na RepresentacAo Permanente de Portugal junto da Uniao Europeia, responsavel pelos pelouros da Educacao, Juventude, e Sande Pnblica. De destacar a actividade desenvolvida no decurso das negociacoes e conciliacoes dos programas comunitarios "SOCRATES e JUVENTUDE". Exerceu a Presidencia do Grupo Sande durante a Presidencia portuguesa de 1 de Janeiro a 30 de Junho 2000. De destacar a aprovacao pelo Conselho Sande da posicao comum relativamente a directiva sobre "a aproximacao das disposicoes legislativas e regulamentares dos Estados Membros no que respeita ao fabrico, a apresentacao e a venda dos produtos do tabaco".
De Fevereiro 1988 a Abril de 1996 Funcionaria da ComissAo Europeia na categoria de Administradora Principal (Grau A4). Responsavel sucessivamente pelos seguintes dossiers: - Orientacao Escolar e Profissional — Lancamento de uma rede de Centros de Orientacao em todos os Estados Membros. GestAo da rede, animacao, acompanhamento e difusao da informacao. Coordenacao da publicacao "Manual Europeu dos Conselheiros de Orientacao" publicado em 9 linguas comunitarias (45 000 exemplares). - Formacao de Professores. - RelacOes corn as Associacties Europeias de professores. - Prevencao do iletrismo e do insucesso escolar. Lancamento gestao e animacao de uma rede de projectos de pareceria obrigatoria entre tits Estados Membros. Em cada projecto deveriam participar a administrack, uma instituicao educativa e urn instituto de investigacao). Portugal participou em dois projectos dos quais resultou a constituicAo do Centro de Recursos da Escola Marquesa de Alorna em Lisboa e o programa inter-geracional de luta contra o iletrismo na Aldeia de Garganta Concelho de Sabrosa. - Responsavel pela organizacao do Ano Europeu de Luta contra o Iletrismo. Coordenacao e acompanhamento de escudos nas areas acima referidas. Organizacao de Conferencias. Publicacoes nestes dominios.
De Outubro 1972 a Setembro de 1983: - Director de Servicos de Estudos da Direccao Geral de Equipamentos Educativos (19821983) - Chefe de DivisAo (1978-1982) Estudos e publicacties sobre as novas tipologias de escolas elaborados tendo em conta a evolucao demografica, a expansao da rede escolar e as sucessivas reformas do sistema educativo, nomeadamente o prolongamento da escolaridade obrigatoria. Estas escolas que comecaram a ser implementadas em regime experimental continuam a ser construidas em todo o pais independentemente das sucessivas reformas introduzidas no sistema e das alteracees dos parametros subjacentes a definicAo das seguintes tipologias de escola: (P, P+C; C;C+S; SU; ES) - Chefe do projecto elaborado com a OCDE sobre equipamentos educativos no distrito de Portalegre. Apresentacao de relatario e discussao da metodologia seguida numa conferencia realizada em Evora (Setembro de 1983) - Colaboracao no programa Preliminar das Escolas Superiores de Educacao ( Projecto financiado pelo Banco Mundial ).
|
|
|
Jadille Baza Apud |
|
|
Fecha de nacimiento: 9 de julio de 1949 Nacionalidad: Chilena Profesi6n: Arquitecto Estudios superiores:1968-1974 Arquitectura. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo de la Universidad de Chile. 1976 Titulo de arquitecto Publicaciones: 1974 "Calculo antisismico de un edificio
de quince pisos". Seminario de titulo. 1975 "CHILEXPO'72". Informe de practica profesional. Universidad de Chile. 1990 Definicion de un sistema de informaci6n al servicio de Ia planificaciOn. Documento, IIPE,UNESCO. 1999-2000 Articulos sobre espacios educativos
para la revista del Colegio de Arquitectos y sobre los nuevos espacios educativos en la decada del 90. Experiencia laboral:1971-1975 Departamento de ferias y exposiciones de Ia CORFO, 1976-1977 Profesora part-time de la Universidad Tecnica del Estado, en las catedras de: Supervision de obras civiles, materiales de construccion y dibujo tecnico. 1976 a la fecha Ministerio de Educacion PUblica. Miembro de la Comision de !eyes y ordenanzas del Colegio de Arquitectos de Chile. 1977 Arquitecto jefe departamento de locales. Ministerio de Educacion POblica. Miembro de la Comision Tecnica Nacional: Formulacion del plan anual de construcciones escolares Aprobaci6n de proyectos de arquitectura. RecepciOn de locales escolares en representacion del Ministerio de Educaci6n. 1980 Sociedad constructora de establecimientos educacionales. 1981a la fecha Superintendencia de educaci6n. Departamento de planificacion, estudios y proyectos. 1990 Jefe del Departamento de Planificacion, Estudios y Proyectos. Directora y Miembro del concursos de arquitectura de establecimientos educacionales. Coordinadora comision nombrada por el Ministro de Educaci6n, para efectos de estudiar el rol del Ministerio de EducaciOn en materias de infraestructura educacional. 1990-1991 Arquitecto jefe de la Unidad de Infraestructura.
de la Calidad y Equidad de la EducaciOn, Habilitacion de los Liceos Humanistico-Cientificos en Tecnic.os Profesionales.
1990-1992 Trabajo de consultoria en el IIPE, Paris-Francia. 1994 Elaboracion y Coordinaci6n Nacional del proyecto conjunto con UNESCO: "OptimizaciOn de la Inversion en Infraestructura educacional". 1995 Asesoria al equipo de la Unidad Nacional de Servicios Tecnico Pedagogicos de la Secretaria de Educacion de Bolivia en materia de fortalecimiento del proceso de inversion educacional (consultoria UNESCO-Paris). Gestion y firma de convenios de colaboraciOn con el proceso de busqueda de nuevos espacios para la educaciOn con el Colegio de Arquitectos y la Direcci6n Nacional de Arquitectura. 1998 Miembro del equipo de trabajo en Educaci6n de la Unibn Internacional de Arquitectos. Analisis experiencia con UNESCO, sobre Reforma en el estado de Puebla, en Mexico, con el Director y equipo del Instituto Internacional 1999 Co-directora del Concurso Nacional de anteproyectos para la construccion del nuevo Liceo de Isla de Pascua, en el marco de la Reforma Educacional. Presidenta del jurado en el concurso con las escuelas de arquitectura para incorporar a las universidades chilenas en la busqueda de mejores espacios para la reforma. 2000 Presidente del Comite de Educacion del Colegio de Arquitectos Consultora Banco BID 2001 Miembro del jurado en el II concurso con
las escuelas de arquitectura para Santiago, Agosto 2001
|
|
|
A. EDUARDO MILLAN M. |
|
|
ARCHITECT — UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA 1971 MEMBER OF U.I.A./UNESCO SINCE 1991 KEY QUALIFICATIONS: Architect specialist in the development of social investment programs for the construction of school facilities, this experience was obtained through 21 yeas working in the area, as well as of from the information interchange from courses and seminars. From 1969 to 1977, as a Ministry of Education Staff member, he coordinated the activities concerning the development of Construction Standards for school facilities as well as the Design, Programming and Planning of the investments related national programs of school's construction. During this professional stage he acted as Director of Special Programs, and was actively involved in the process that allowed the obtention of a World Bank credit for the construction of 1 Polytechnical College, 8 Middle Schools and 20 Elementary Schools, and also in the creation of FEDE —FOUNDATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND FURNISHMENT OF SCHOOLS-. In 1984 as Technical Secretary in FEDE - he took charge of all activities related to the management of the national school construction programs, and goes on to exercise the Presidency of the referred organism from 1987 to 1989. In these functions he coordinated the execution of investments at the national level for the construction, endowment, repair and maintenance of school buildings, incorporating as a policy the involvement of communities to these processes. Since 1990, as a Chief Manager of TECNICA AFE C.A provides technical assistance to different public and private organisms in the area of architecture for education, and for any other public service. Under his leadership, TECNICA AFE, developed several projects, among them the following:
Caracas. July 2001
|
|
|
|
LOURDES MELENDEZ |
|
ARCHITECT -UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA 1971 COUNTRY: VENEZUELA MEMBER OF U.I.A./UNESCO SINCE 1991. KEY QUALIFICATIONS: Architect whose major area of expertise is the Physical Planning, the Development of Standards, the Design of Building Systems and the Maintenance programs for public school facilities. During her years as a staff member of FEDE —"VENEZUELAN FOUNDATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND FURNISHMENT OF SCHOOLS" - she managed all the tasks involved in the planning, execution and follow up of the Repair and Maintenance Programs for Elementary and Middle School Buildings at a national level, including the allocation of funds and human resources, and the administration of construction contracts. As an specialist on the operation and maintenance of these kind of schools, she has participated on the following projects:
degree of deterioration b) The data gathering of 400 school buildings c) Database with architectural, electric and sanitary blueprints.
Caracas, July 2001
|
|
|
|
ANTON SCHWEIGHOFER |
|
Born 1930, living in Vienna, free-lance architect since 1959, professor of building design at the Technical University of Vienna since 1977. Theoretical and practical works for cultural and educational buildings Research work on Adolf Loos and on typology Exhibitions and Lectures in all parts of the world. Several national and international awards, Dr.h.c. TU-Brunn, Czech Republic and Budapest, member of the UlA Working Group since 1967. Some works became nationally and internationally known: SOS-children's' village in India, schools, hospitals, and apartments in Austria, Germany, and other countries. Institute for Behavioral Research in Vienna, the University of Agriculture in Vienna, A Research Station in the Arctic, and currently a Geriatric Center in the building phase.
|
|
|